告诉你在城市里和高速上开越野车为什么是等同于
展开全文
现在很多人都以为开越野车(AWD或SUV)前后有保险杠,车大,宽,所以很安全,而且很男人,很MAN,很哭,所以现在开越野车成了种时尚,,其实,,这完全是个误区。。为什么呢,首先我们要简要了解一下越野车的用途。
越野越野,英文叫 CROSS COUNTRY, 越野车叫ALL WHEEL DRIVE 最近加入了 SUV,运动型工具车。。
越野车是为了能顺利通过崎岖不平的公路甚至没有公路的前提下而设计的,,车架,车身,底盘,底盘高度,还有轮胎抓地,差速器等和普通的车设计大不相同。说白了,越野车不是为城市和良好的路面设计的,尽管他也能在上述的路面开。。。。
话归正题。
城市里需要越野车吗,我个人觉得不需要,尤其是一般企事业和个人就更不需要。除了一些特殊的部门比如军队,地质勘探,林业等。
国外在限制越野车方面起步较早,,为了能限制越野车, 美国的一些国会议员甚至称AWD为 “”。
为了限制越野车在城市使用而在去年颁布了一系列法案,严格限制AWD(AWD为越野车缩写)在市区的使用,包括提高AWD每年的注册费,提高AWD在市区的停车费用,加收AWD的排放费用。。
有人会问,,,那些国会议员和4驱/越野车有仇吗,为何要如此赶尽杀绝,非也。原因如下,
城市越野汽车1 。 越野车在城市和高速路上不安全,,,那些认为越野车大,宽,有BULL BAR防撞栏的人犯了个常识性的错误
下面是 美国 国家高速路安全管理处的一个报告
Problems With Trucks & SUVs - Representing the Advocates for Highway and Auto Safety, consumer activist Joan Claybrook presented the following information to the House of Representatives in 1996 and 1997: "Each year nearly 5,000 Americans die in tr
uck crashes. According to the IIHS, in 1995, 98 percent of the people killed in two-vehicle crashes involving passenger cars and big trucks were occupants of the passenger vehicles. Since 1992, there have been more fatalities in collisions involving SUVs and cars than in car-to- car crashes, largely as a result of the disparity in vehicle weight (mass), height, and front-end aggressivity between SUVs and passenger cars. Of those persons fatally injured in SUV-car collisions, the vast majority, eighty per cent, were car occupants (see NHTSA report, 'Relationships Between Vehicle Size and Fatality Risk')."
Four-wheel-drive pickup trucks and sport utility vehicles (SUVs) are designed to be driven for work, hauling, and off-road purposes. They were not designed to be people movers, and don't handle nearly as well as passenger cars or minivans. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) reports that SUVs are four times more likely to roll over than passenger cars in high-speed maneuvers. In addition, some smaller top-heavy SUVs have rolled over in NHTSA side impact collision testing. SUV-to-car collisions are six times more likely to kill the occupants of the smaller vehicle when compared to a normal car-to-car collision. You may be safer inside an SUV, but you're at greater risk of ki
lling others in the event of an accident.
上面提到,,因为越野车重心高,在高速路上翻车的比率是普通轿车的4倍,而且因为AWD的底盘重,一旦翻车,驾驶室的支撑柱(B柱和C柱)将无法支撑底盘,很有可能底盘会把车里的人压死。
其次,AWD害人害己,在越野车和普通轿车碰撞的事故中,如果越野车没翻车,那对普通轿车的伤害会是对方对己方伤害的6倍,,就是说,越野车的人也许没事,但普通车里的人受的伤害是越野车的6倍。。。
再则,,为了所谓的个性和帅气而去买越野车,结果出事后把人家好端端的家庭拆散,,,这是种无耻的私心啊。。有人也许会说,我不撞死他,他就会撞死我,所以我要买比他更厉害的车,,那么请问是不是以后上街都要开坦克呢,不遵守交通规则坦克也未必救的了你啊。所以NHTSA(美国高管局)强烈建议个人如果没有必要最好不买SUV越野车。
further more, SUV比普通车耗油,排放的指标也不高,比普通车污染重,浪费的能源也多,
这边最高的 RANGE ROVER也不过 欧III,,能用天然气会好些,在这个优价高企,能源匮乏的情况下,没事开SUV/4WD浪费的资源可不少啊,不为自己想也为子孙想想,留点青山给孩子们吧。。
第4, 城市人多车多,SUV/ AWD 车体普遍大,占用大量的空间,加剧塞车的情况,赛车浪费的可单只你一个人时间,而是一人的宝贵时间,浪费时间是犯罪啊。。
以上 不包括 类似 东风 CRV, TOYOTA, RAV4,三零 欧蓝德等小型城市几扑,不过建议能不开还是少开。
THE END
参考书目:
/exp/statistics/statistics.htm
第4章节
发布评论